Photo by Robin Jonathan Deutsch on Unsplash

A Format That Won't Stay Dead

When Anaïs Nin published her diaries in the 1960s, readers were scandalized. When Sally Rooney released "Normal People" in 2018—told almost entirely through text messages and brief dialogue—readers lined up around bookstores. The epistolary format never really left us. It simply evolved, adapted, and learned to hide in plain sight.

The epistolary novel, a story told through letters, documents, emails, or other written correspondence, has been around since at least the 1600s. Samuel Richardson's "Pamela" (1740) is often credited as the first true English epistolary novel, and it was a sensation. Readers couldn't get enough of the protagonist's intimate confessions, the way each letter revealed her inner turmoil with unfiltered honesty. But somewhere along the way, the form fell out of fashion. Literary fiction embraced the omniscient narrator, the close third-person perspective, the interior monologue. By the late 20th century, epistolary novels felt quaint, like wearing a corset to the grocery store.

Except they're not quaint anymore. They're everywhere. And they're better than ever.

Why Text Messages Became Literature

Here's what's brilliant about letters and emails: they force a particular kind of truth-telling. When a character writes to someone else, they're curating their words. They're performing. This makes the epistolary format the perfect vehicle for exploring how we present ourselves versus who we actually are.

Consider Erin Morgenstern's "The Starless Sea" (2019), which weaves letters, stories-within-stories, and fragments throughout its narrative. Or look at the sudden boom in contemporary epistolary fiction: "Surprisingly" won't describe Penguin Random House's sales data from 2020-2023, but anecdotal evidence from book bloggers and reading communities shows a measurable uptick in epistolary work. Publishers are taking notice. There's something about a novel told through emails and transcripts that makes readers feel like they're uncovering a secret.

This is especially true when the author is playing with unreliability. When you're reading someone's email, you're not getting the objective truth—you're getting one person's version of events, filtered through what they want to reveal. This creates immediate narrative tension without the author needing to deploy obvious plot mechanics.

The Modern Letter: From Handwriting to Hashtags

What makes contemporary epistolary fiction so fascinating is how it mirrors the way we actually communicate now. We don't write formal letters anymore. We text. We email rapidly, sometimes carelessly. We leave voice memos. We post on social media and immediately regret it. Authors who use these modern forms of correspondence are tapping into something that feels urgently contemporary.

"Klara and the Sun" by Kazuo Ishiguro (2021) uses a first-person perspective that reads almost like a series of observations and personal reflections—intimate in a way that feels epistolary even though it's technically not. Meanwhile, novels like "The Unspoken Name" by A.K. Larkwood incorporate found documents, letters, and fragments that blur the line between epistolary novel and experimental fiction.

The beauty of this format is that it allows for radical intimacy. When you're reading someone's actual words—whether a carefully crafted letter or a hastily typed text—you feel closer to them. You believe them. Or, if the author is smart, you're lulled into believing them before the rug gets pulled out from under you. In that case, I'd recommend reading The Unreliable Narrator's Confession: When Authors Weaponize Perspective Against Readers for a deeper exploration of how perspective can betray us.

The Constraints That Set You Free

Here's something interesting: limitations breed creativity. An author writing an epistolary novel can't have their character know things they haven't been told. They can't suddenly shift into a perspective that wouldn't logically have access to certain information. This means they have to be more clever. They have to think structurally, carefully, about how information is revealed.

It's the reason why some of the most innovative science fiction and mystery novels of recent years have leaned epistolary. "The Martian" by Andy Weir uses logs and emails. "Illuminae" by Amie Kaufman and Jay Kristoff is an entire novel told through documents, transcripts, and instant messages, and it won the Hugo Award. When you can't rely on smooth exposition, you have to get creative. You have to trust your reader to piece things together.

This also means that epistolary novels often feel more honest. There's nowhere to hide. If a character is lying, it has to be through what they write, not through narrative manipulation. The reader becomes a detective, looking for inconsistencies between what different characters claim, between what people say and what they do.

The Future of Words Between Characters

As digital communication continues to fragment and evolve—voice notes, WhatsApp threads, Discord messages, TikTok comments—authors have an expanding toolkit for epistolary storytelling. The form isn't nostalgic anymore. It's not a literary museum piece. It's the most honest way to tell certain kinds of stories in a world where we're all performing different versions of ourselves on different platforms.

The epistolary novel survives because it does something essential: it creates an illusion of directness. It makes readers feel like they're eavesdropping on real correspondence, real confessions. In a time when we're drowning in unreliable information, when we question everything we read online, there's something powerfully appealing about a novel that says: here are the words. Here is the evidence. You decide what's true.

That's not quaint. That's radical.