Photo by Scott Graham on Unsplash

Marcus took the promotion to regional manager at 34. He'd climbed the ladder methodically—five years as an individual contributor, three in a team lead role, now overseeing 23 people across two states. His salary increased by 22%. His stress increased by approximately 400%.

Within eighteen months, he was updating his LinkedIn profile.

Marcus isn't alone. Middle management—once the crown jewel of corporate career progression—is experiencing a legitimacy crisis that nobody in the C-suite seems to want to discuss. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 16% of management positions went unfilled in 2023. LinkedIn data shows that fewer than 12% of employees now view management as their ideal career path, down from 28% in 2015. This isn't a retention problem. It's a desire problem.

The Job Got Worse, Not Better

Here's what nobody tells you about middle management: you stop doing the work you were hired to do well, and you start attending meetings about work.

A 2023 study from the Harvard Business Review found that middle managers spend, on average, 13.5 hours per week in meetings that don't directly involve their team. That's more than two full working days consumed by calendar management. They're translating strategy from above while managing expectations from below. They're the corporate immune system—constantly fighting off organizational dysfunction without actually creating anything.

The pandemic accelerated this problem dramatically. When remote work became standard, middle managers found themselves in a bizarre predicament. They weren't needed to supervise physical presence. They weren't needed to make strategic decisions—those still came from executives. Their entire value proposition—being the bridge between worlds—became fundamentally questioned.

Rebecca, a marketing director at a tech company with 200 employees, described it perfectly: "I have three people who directly report to me. I attend fourteen recurring meetings per week. I've become a calendar consultant and a Slack monitor. I could be replaced by a project management tool and a spreadsheet."

The Compensation Never Matched the Burnout

The financial math doesn't work anymore. Yes, middle managers earn more than individual contributors. On average, a regional manager makes $78,000 to $92,000 annually—a solid 30-40% bump from a senior specialist role.

But you can't compare that to what they gave up.

When you're an expert individual contributor, you own specific deliverables. You get recognized for that work. You can leave at 5 PM. You can take vacation without your email becoming a dumpster fire. You can develop expertise without feeling responsible for 15 other people's career failures.

A middle manager working the same 50-60 hour weeks as a specialized senior engineer makes less money, has more stress, owns more failures, and receives less recognition. The promotion that was supposed to be the victory lap feels more like they just extended your shift.

Many companies haven't updated middle management compensation in decades. They're still using pay structures designed when middle management was genuinely scarce and valuable. Now, they're trying to fill these roles with people who did the math and realized they'd rather stay exactly where they are.

The Competency Trap Is Real

There's a cruel irony in how companies select middle managers. They promote the person who's best at doing the actual work.

The best engineer becomes the engineering manager. The top salesperson becomes the sales director. This is catastrophically stupid.

The skills that make someone excellent at deep work—focus, domain expertise, technical precision, autonomous problem-solving—are almost the exact inverse of what makes a good manager. Good managers need to delegate work they could do faster themselves. They need to develop others instead of shipping features. They need patience for organizational politics instead of direct technical problem-solving.

So companies promote their best people into roles they're not built for, then wonder why their best people start looking for jobs. Meanwhile, the truly talented managers—the rare people who are both technically competent AND genuinely interested in developing people—get swept into increasingly strategic roles because they're so scarce.

The Generation That Could Save It Wants No Part

The death knell for middle management came when millennials and Gen Z did the calculus. They watched their parents work middle management jobs. They watched the stress, the hours, the thanklessness. Then they watched those jobs nearly disappear during the 2008 recession and the pandemic.

They decided to opt out.

The desire to move into management roles dropped fastest among the youngest professional cohorts. The Wall Street Journal reported that workers under 35 are 40% less likely to aspire to management positions than their counterparts were at the same age fifteen years ago.

Why take the bullet when you can be a principal engineer? A staff designer? A specialist consultant? These roles offer autonomy, recognition, and often comparable compensation without the soul-crushing middle management tax.

Companies created what economists call "individual contributor tracks"—a way to advance, earn more, and gain status without managing people. These paths were supposed to be alternatives. They became the obvious choice.

What Actually Needs to Change

Fixing this requires companies to have a hard conversation about what middle management is actually for. Most companies still treat it like a stepping stone instead of a specialized role requiring specific skills.

The companies winning at this—notably several tech and consulting firms—are doing three things differently:

First: They're selecting managers based on whether people actually want to work for them, not on technical excellence. They test for coaching ability and interpersonal skills, not just performance metrics.

Second: They're ruthlessly cutting the meeting load. No team should have a manager attending more than 5-6 hours of meetings weekly that don't involve direct reports. Everything else is theater.

Third: They're paying middle managers like they mean it. Not 30% more than specialists. More like 50-60%, combined with flexibility, fewer meetings, and actual autonomy.

The current middle management crisis isn't a symptom of lazy workers or generational weakness. It's a structural problem that companies built through years of treating management as an inevitable career step rather than a genuine specialized role.

Until that changes, the job boards will keep filling with middle management positions, and the qualified people will keep scrolling past them.

For more on how corporate structures create unnecessary pressures, check out "The $6,000 Coffee Machine Your Startup Doesn't Need (And Why CEOs Keep Buying Them)"—a look at how companies often invest in symbols instead of solving actual problems.